
Well here it is, if there was one summer blockbuster that had a beast of a hype machine parallel to J.J. Abrams' reboot of "Star Trek," it's probably this one.
This is the review of "Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen," and considering how much hype/venom there has been in the Michael Bay-directed film series, I think it calls for a special type of review.
So as an ode to the goofy comedy machine that is FOX News, my review will be done in the style of talking points.
Here we go.
MICHAEL BAY IS RAPING MY CHILDHOOD WITH THIS MOVIE! WHY OH WHY IS IT HIM!?!
That is one statement that has been said plenty of times on pretty much any and all message board, blog, etc. that mentions any single bit about the Bay-directed Transformers movies. Here's my problem with this overused and irrelevant phrase. Really, did Michael Bay, personally back in the days of your childhood do something that scarring? Did he come to your house and personally say that Santa Claus doesn't exist? Smashed all of your toys? The fact of the matter is, Hollywood does not hate Michael Bay. If he did, would he still be getting work? Of course Bay is not perfect, but if you lived through the 90s, you know that his movies are about big, over the top action sequences, a straight line of a story and mood lighting. Like it or not, Bay was the choice for this type of movie. What exactly type of movie is a Transformers movie? More on that later. But really, I believe all the bitching towards Michael Bay is straight up jealousy. Don't get me wrong, I too would be envious of a guy who has made it a career of creating movies where he gets to legally blow up things, work with attractive people and gets paid handsomely to do it. Were people thinking they were going to get a "serious" director like Michael Mann or Darren Arronofsky? Look at it this way, they could have given it to Uwe Bol.
THIS MOVIE IS TOTALLY INACCURATE! AND...THERE'S NO PLOT! AND...RAGE!Okay, quick history lesson people. The "Transformers" franchise first started out as toys. As action figures. The makers, Hasbro decided that in order to make these toys fly off the shelves, they decided to create a cartoon show. Then subsequently a comic book series. So, let's recap: 1st- toys. 2nd- cartoon show. 3rd- comic books. That is how the "Transformers" franchise started out. Now as for the whole premise of them, it is simply this: giant robots from another planet that can transform into everyday vehicles and have had a feud for the longest of times and constantly beat the snot out of each other. That is all there is to the storyline and no amount of fan fiction/soapboxing will ever make them into an expose into the subconsciousness about how man is killing the planet and some other baloney like that. No people, it's giant robots beating the crap out of each other. Really we should be lucky that they even tied human beings into the movies, but then again, robots don't feel emotion, so without the humans, why else should we care, right? We all remember the cartoons, some way more than is suited for normal health and it's annoying that those that "remember it vividly" take such great offense to another person's
retelling of a work of fiction. It's as if they were personally involved with Hasbro when the toys were introduced, which I have a fairly good hunch that maybe is true for oh about... 1% of people in the world. They even tell you in the credits with the phrase, "Based on the toys..." TOYS! people. If you are crying inaccuracy because that is not how
you remembered playing with Transformers toys, well then you are just simply asking for way too much and I'm sure if Bay and executive producer Steven Speilberg wanted to consult you during the production process, they would have.
YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO HATE THIS MOVIE BECAUSE WE SAID IT'S BAD, SO THERE
The bottom line is, I, myself, I enjoyed "Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen." It is not going to be some epic drama. Never was meant to be. Consider the source material and if somehow, you managed to "Citizen Kane" out of it, well then, your imagination is way more active/vivid than mine. The second movie did it's purpose in that it continued along the story and uped the volume on the action sequences and property damage. In fact, just from the action sequences which were entertaining as hell, the visuals make it a pretty damn good movie. Is it going to win awards for "Best Picture?" Of course now, but from a technical standpoint, those were some pretty good special effects and those artists deserve credit, praise and the paychecks they got; just look at the scene when one of the most iconic Decepticons of all time, Devastator is constructed. "Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen" is the very definition of a summer blockbuster popcorn movie and the characteristics that come with it and being that it's a sequel, it lives up to what you'd expect in a sequel. If you're not familiar with the role of a sequel, it's supposed to continue the story and in the case of a sci-fi/action movie, improve upon the scenes from it's predecesor. That other trait of sequels surpassing the first movie, really is more of a status that a very, very small number of films have actually done without fail. This is not one of those movies and you shouldn't expect it. What you should expect from watching "Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen," is to be entertained for a solid couple of hours with a lot of colors and things going PEW! PEW! and don't forget the BOOM!
That is what "Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen" is and frankly and honestly, if you didn't like it because this and that was wrong or because Shia LeBouf is goofy or because Michael Bay smells bad or something along those lines, then perhaps movie watching is not an activity you should continue to do.